Is chasing a Coeur d'Alene electrocution claim even worth it if you live in another state?
“is it even worth dealing with an Idaho construction injury claim for electrical burns if I live in Washington and got hurt working a civilian job in Coeur d'Alene while I'm in the National Guard”
— Marcus T., Spokane Valley
A Guard member hurt by exposed wiring on a Coeur d'Alene jobsite may have an Idaho workers' comp claim, a separate third-party case, and a messier timeline because home-state assumptions usually screw this up.
Yes, it can be worth it.
But not because the process is easy. It usually isn't.
It's worth it because electrical burns are the kind of injury that looks smaller on day one than it really is. Entry wound, exit wound, numb hand, muscle pain, maybe a fall after the shock. Then the nerve damage shows up. Grip strength drops. Sleep gets wrecked. Scarring tightens. A guy who can normally handle conduit, ladders, panels, and twelve-hour shifts suddenly can't trust his own hands.
If this happened on a civilian construction job in Coeur d'Alene, the first thing to get straight is simple: your National Guard status does not magically turn this into a military case.
If you were not on orders, not drilling, and not injured during Guard duty, this is usually treated like a civilian workplace injury.
Living in Washington doesn't move the claim there
This is where people burn time they don't have.
A lot of workers in the Coeur d'Alene area live across the line in Spokane Valley, Liberty Lake, or somewhere else in eastern Washington, then cross I-90 for work. When the injury happens in Idaho, people assume they should file where they live. That's often wrong.
If the exposed wiring incident happened on a jobsite in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho law is likely going to matter a lot, and Idaho's workers' compensation system may be the main lane, especially if the employer is based here or the project is here.
That means Idaho deadlines, Idaho paperwork, Idaho insurance carrier, and usually the Idaho Industrial Commission if benefits are denied or delayed.
The adjuster doesn't give a damn that your driver's license says Washington.
Workers' comp is probably part of this, but not all of it
For an electrocution or serious electrical burn on a construction site, workers' comp is usually the first bucket of money.
That can cover medical treatment and wage loss. It does not pay pain and suffering. That's the bad trade built into the system.
But exposed wiring on a construction site often raises another question: who left that hazard there?
Was it your direct employer? A general contractor? An electrical subcontractor? A property owner who energized something too early? A rental equipment company with bad temporary power setup? On busy North Idaho commercial projects, more than one company can touch the same dangerous area.
That's why these cases sometimes split into two tracks:
- an Idaho workers' comp claim against the employer's insurance, and
- a separate third-party injury claim against someone other than your employer if another company created or ignored the exposed-wire hazard
That second track is where full damages may be available, including pain, suffering, future impairment, and big future-care costs.
Electrical burns are expensive in ways people miss
Kootenai Health can stabilize you. Burn follow-up, nerve testing, grafting, rehab, hand therapy, cardiology workup after a shock, and lost earning capacity are where the real money starts adding up.
A lot of workers try to tough it out because they need the paycheck and because Guard culture doesn't exactly reward complaining.
That's a mistake.
Electric injury cases are not just about skin burns. The current can cause internal damage, nerve injury, muscle breakdown, heart rhythm issues, and falls from height after the shock. If you got thrown off a ladder or decking, now you've got orthopedic injuries mixed in too.
The out-of-state mess changes strategy, not value
The hassle is real.
You're dealing with treatment near home, an Idaho jobsite, probably an Idaho carrier, maybe a Washington doctor, and possibly a dispute about work restrictions or where records get sent. Mileage reimbursement, approved specialists, and who gets to direct care can turn into a stupid fight fast.
But hassle alone is not a reason to walk away from a serious claim.
A worker with electrical burns who can't return to full construction duty is not dealing with a nuisance case. That's especially true for a National Guard member whose civilian income matters just as much as military benefits. If your civilian job gets wrecked, the financial hit can last longer than the Guard side of your life.
The evidence disappears fast on construction sites
This part matters in Coeur d'Alene more than people think because projects move quickly. By the next week, the temporary power may be changed, the panel closed, the wire capped, the trench backfilled, the framing covered, and everyone suddenly has selective memory.
Get photos if they exist. Identify every contractor on site. Keep the incident report. Save your hard hat, gloves, burned clothing, and boots. Write down who saw it. If there was a lockout/tagout failure, missing warning, wet conditions, bad extension power, or an energized line where it shouldn't have been, that needs to be pinned down early.
Spring jobsites in North Idaho are muddy, wet, and chaotic. Water and temporary power are a nasty combination.
So is it worth it?
If this was a minor scare and you were back to normal in three days, maybe not.
If you suffered real burns, nerve symptoms, time off work, lifting limits, hand weakness, scarring, or a permanent change in what kind of construction work you can do, yes, it's worth the hassle.
Because once this gets reduced to "out-of-state worker had a workplace accident," the money side gets treated like paperwork.
Electrical burn cases are not paperwork.
They're the kind of injury that can quietly take away the exact physical ability your civilian job depends on, and Idaho law does not stop mattering just because home is on the other side of the state line.
This article is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Every case is different. If you or a loved one was injured, talk to an attorney about your situation.
Talk to a lawyer for free →